X Close

Women have reasons to fear a Burnham premiership

'Either you believe that women have an unequivocal right to single-sex spaces or you don’t.' Credit: Getty

‘Either you believe that women have an unequivocal right to single-sex spaces or you don’t.’ Credit: Getty

24 June 2026 - 7:00am

Who is Andy Burnham? People who aren’t obsessed with politics are scratching their heads, following the return of the so-called King of the North to Westminster. Burnham has been away from the Commons for almost a decade, and while he barrels towards No. 10, he remains an unknown quantity for many voters. Not, however, for some of the women who have followed his career, who’ve found plenty to worry about.

It’s not just that Burnham’s record on women’s rights is alarming, though it is. He’s also flirted with economic policies which appear neutral but would disproportionately affect vulnerable women. Almost 1.7 million pensioners live in poverty, and more than half of those are women. Yet Burnham has repeatedly expressed interest in a land value tax, which would replace council tax and stamp duty with an annual levy of up to 0.5% of a house or flat’s value. While an “initial” cap has been floated, an 80-year-old widow who owns a house valued at £1 million, for instance — and that’s far from unusual in cities like London — could eventually face an annual charge of almost £5,000. A Burnham government could find itself accused of forcing elderly women to sell their homes and leave communities they’ve lived in for decades.

There are other fears, too. Until last week, Burnham was the Mayor of Greater Manchester, an area which has become notorious for some of the worst grooming gang scandals. He set up a series of reviews into historical abuse, but Maggie Oliver, a former detective constable who exposed her own force’s failings in Rochdale, has claimed that Burnham failed at “the final hurdle”, allegedly undermining a so-called “final assurance review” into more recent abuse cases. The former mayor has rejected these criticisms, but one of his allies, the fellow Manchester MP Lucy Powell, who is also Labour’s Deputy Leader, had to apologise last year after appearing to dismiss the issue as a “dog whistle”.

Yet there is ultimately one reason above all others that women have reasons to distrust Burnham. His enthusiasm for the wilder shores of trans activism dates back to 2019, when he signed a letter demanding that the Conservative government make it easier for biological men to get a certificate saying they were legally women. Three years later, Burnham was insisting that biological men who identify as women should be able to use women’s toilets. He dismissed opposition from feminists — “supposed feminists” in his words — as a “minority view”.

Last month, as his pronouncements on the subject came under greater scrutiny, he faced a dilemma. How could he appear to accept the Supreme Court judgment on the primacy of biological sex without alienating noisy trans activists in the PLP? The answer is a fudge: he now says “the time has come” to implement Equality and Human Rights Commission guidance, while insisting on the need “to find common ground”. There is none — either you believe that women have an unequivocal right to single-sex spaces or you don’t — and it speaks volumes about Burnham’s character that he claims to believe otherwise.

The current PLP is unrepresentative of anyone but activists, yet its members will decide which names are on the party’s leadership ballot, assuming that a leadership contest goes ahead. A “coronation” is also on the cards, allowing Burnham to become prime minister without having to reveal his policies in detail. That’s a worrying prospect for women — whose fears around Burnham’s record will go unscrutinised and unanswered — while Labour MPs continue to project all their unrealistic hopes and expectations onto their much-vaunted King of the North.


Joan Smith is a novelist and columnist. She was previously Chair of the Mayor of London’s Violence Against Women and Girls Board, and is on the advisory group for Sex Matters. Her book Unfortunately, She Was A Nymphomaniac: A New History of Rome’s Imperial Women was published in November 2024.

polblonde

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

1 July 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam