X Close

What happened to Candace Owens?

Gone off the deep end. Credit: YouTube

Gone off the deep end. Credit: YouTube

August 17 2024 - 5:00pm

Candace Owens spent the past half-decade becoming a poster child for young conservatism. She had raw talent and used it, amassing millions of followers, headlining the Right’s largest conferences and sitting down with its most prominent figures, such as former president Donald Trump.

Yet the commentator has taken a turn since leaving the Daily Wire earlier this year. In an interview this week, Owens claimed that Joseph Stalin was Jewish and part of a cabal that is now ‘occupying’ America. Recently, she staked her ‘professional reputation’ on Brigitte Macron secretly being a man. And she has revised the Second World War to be a tale of Allied powers targeting Catholics across the globe. And this week, during an interview with Andrew Tate, she equated support for Israel with ‘defense for pedophilia’. What happened?

Just two weeks ago, Owens was set to headline a fundraiser for the Trump campaign that featured Donald Trump Jr. After an online backlash regarding many of her remarks and conspiracy theories, it was announced she was no longer attending. She denied that it had anything to do with her views. But when the Trump campaign judges you to be too far to the Right, that says something.

Until last year, Owens was a skillful and forceful communicator. During the BLM era, she challenged liberal shibboleths on police brutality and white supremacy, and along with other conservatives was subsequently vindicated when policies such as ‘defund the police’ were slowly rolled back.

But as the news turned toward Israel last year, Owens’s persona changed. After October 7, she started referring to a ‘ring’ or mafia of Jews operating in Hollywood and Washington. She discussed at length why history’s demonization of Adolf Hitler ought to be reconsidered, and progressively questioned or denied elements of the Holocaust, referring to it as ‘an ethnic cleansing that almost took place’ and calling historical evidence of horrific Nazi science experiments ‘bizarre propaganda’.

She fixated on Second World War history, claiming America should not have involved itself. She also parroted Third Reich propaganda, arguing that Russia’s Bolsheviks were Jews building ‘Christian death camps’. Owens even said that ethnic Jews should have been held accountable.

When the online backlash swiftly followed, even from some of her former colleagues, it was a confirmation for Owens that she was questioning the right things. ‘What they didn’t want people to see is now being seen,’ she wrote on X last month.

The absurdity in all this is hard to understate. Stalin, the murderous communist dictator who Owens claims was secretly Jewish, attended a Russian Orthodox seminary in his youth and actually planned to inflict genocide on the Jews before his death. He purged Jewish sections from the party early on. Elsewhere, she claims the Jewish Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is just another ‘Bolshevist dragging Christian men to the slaughter’ by sending them off to war.

As Owens started to entertain these views publicly, her partnership with the Daily Wire ended. But many, on both the anti-Israel Right and Left, came to her defense, arguing that the outlet was trying to censor pro-Palestine voices. That claim has allowed Owens to maintain mainstream partnerships on her latest solo venture and her position as a headliner of prominent conferences for the conservative movement.

But now that the Trump campaign has distanced itself from her, might others soon follow? Candace Owens left the conservative movement months ago. Now, conservatives are leaving her.


Ariel David is the founder and editor-in-chief of Upward News.


China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam