X Close

Rachel Reeves has no answer to UK’s struggling economy

All going to plan. Credit: Getty

All going to plan. Credit: Getty

3 March 2025 - 4:30pm

Today’s latest report from the Confederation of British Industry will do nothing to cheer up Rachel Reeves. The Chancellor of the Exchequer is already under pressure from her own caucus over the spending cuts she’s been forced to make in order to stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules and tax pledges. Her hope for a get-out-of-jail-free card from rising economic growth looks increasingly fanciful, with the CBI reporting that business expectations for the coming quarter are down sharply, driven by weak consumer expectations. All told, the CBI expects private sector activity to fall for yet another quarter.

In other words, the economy continues to bump along bottom with few signs of renewed vigour. If it’s any consolation, Britain is far from alone in its predicament. Few of the developed economies are growing much at all and those which are, such as Greece and Spain, tend to be the countries that took the biggest falls back in the 2011 euro crisis, so to some extent they’re just making up lost ground. As for the supposed star performer of the developed world, the recent growth of the United States has been driven by a surge in debt that has risen faster than the economy itself, a model which has an obvious sell-by date which may arrive soon.

There are still a few glimmers of hope. The CBI report did find that manufacturing is growing. Paradoxically, the threat of a European war, as Donald Trump threatens to withdraw his country’s backstop for the continent’s security, may provide further support to the manufacturing rebound, since orders for guns and ammo are expected to boom. And Britain’s stock market, like those of other European countries, appears to be profiting from the apparent rotation out of US shares, as the American market rally peters out. Whereas the S&P500 index is up by barely a percent since the start of the year, the FTSE100’s gain is now approaching double digits.

Still, it’s hard to see where much future economic growth will come from. As symbolic as manufacturing may be to a country’s sense of productivity, Britain’s is a service economy, and that’s a sector the CBI expects to remain in the doldrums. Meanwhile, although the country’s leading business lobby is consequently calling for more Government action to rev up growth, it’s hard to detect much direction from Downing Street. The Chancellor insists she will stick to her fiscal rules and the ill-advised pledges she made during last year’s election not to raise most taxes.

Her promises to nevertheless boost infrastructure and social spending were already looking financially stretched, and depended on a favourable economic wind which never blew. Since she delivered her autumn Budget, the fiscal backdrop has worsened and the geopolitical environment has grown more fraught, forcing the Prime Minister to pledge an increase in the defence budget — which he said will nonetheless be done without raising spending. While the sums on cutting aid to fund defence just about add up, few see this as a serious long-term solution.

If the Chancellor won’t return to Parliament with a more realistic long-term budget plan, the Prime Minister may eventually have no choice but to replace her. If he doesn’t, and if the Government continues to hope that growth will somehow come riding over the mountain to rescue them, investors and consumers may well decide to keep their wallets closed until a more plausible future appears.


John Rapley is an author and academic who divides his time between London, Johannesburg and Ottawa. His books include Why Empires Fall: Rome, America and the Future of the West (with Peter Heather, Penguin, 2023) and Twilight of the Money Gods: Economics as a Religion (Simon & Schuster, 2017).

jarapley

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

1 July 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam