Lara Trump, once mocked by her father-in-law as the “black sheep” of the family, now appears poised to formally launch the Trump political dynasty. When Thom Tillis announced on Sunday that he wouldn’t seek re-election, North Carolina Republicans immediately began discussing Lara, who had declined to run for an open Senate seat there in 2022, as their dream candidate. Now a frontrunner for the seat in 2026, her transformation from family outsider to heir apparent reveals something important about how power actually transfers in modern America.

The reversal is remarkable. While Ivanka Trump trained for two decades in the family business, and Don Jr built the social media presence which helped him push JD Vance onto his father’s ticket, Lara quietly accumulated the tools of actual political power. As co-chair of the Republican National Committee she oversaw Trump’s 2024 victory, while her Fox News show provides a weekly propaganda platform. Now she’s positioned to replace a senator who committed the unforgivable sin of occasionally reading legislation and voting with his conscience.

Tillis sealed his fate when he actually read Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” and found Medicaid cuts buried in thousands of pages. Rather than rubber-stamp the bill, he took to the Senate floor to denounce provisions that would hurt his state. “I don’t bow to anybody when the people of North Carolina are at risk,” he told reporters. Trump’s response was swift: primary threats which made Tillis’s decision inevitable.

American political dynasties typically evolve across generations through strategic geographic positioning. The Kennedys slowly spread from Massachusetts to New York to Maryland. The Bushes migrated from Connecticut to Texas to Florida. The Adamses and Roosevelts took decades to build their networks. The Trumps are attempting something different: rapid succession while the patriarch still totally controls the party machinery.

Lara’s potential match-up with former Democratic governor Roy Cooper highlights this transformation. Cooper won two gubernatorial elections on ballots that also elected Donald Trump, maintaining 52% approval ratings with 36% support even among Republicans. Over the course of a 40-year career that saw him win all 13 races he entered, Cooper mastered the mechanics of vote-counting and coalition-building that once defined successful politicians. Against him, Republicans are betting on name recognition.

This confidence reflects how completely Trump has reshaped voter expectations. Mark Robinson, the President’s pick for North Carolina governor, lost by 14 points last year following revelations that he had referred to himself as a “black Nazi” in comments made on a porn site. Yet Republicans believe Lara represents kryptonite for Cooper and the Democrats. The calculation is simple: competence matters less than brand loyalty in the new Republican Party, and no one is more loyal than Lara, who has spent years preparing for this.

Timing is key here. While Donald Trump Jr tied with Vance at 30% in January polling for the 2028 presidential nomination, he dropped to 2% in February’s CPAC straw poll as the VP surged to 61%. He’s clearly not ready for prime time, and the family needs institutional positioning beyond social media presence. A Senate seat provides that foundation, especially one seized from a “disloyal” incumbent.

Lara’s Fox show lays the groundwork for this on a weekly basis. The format — soft-focus conversations with administration figures and other valuable allies — wouldn’t seem unusual in state media, yet it airs on America’s most-watched news network and has dominated the ratings in its time slot. She knows how to build bridges and keep the base entertained.

The Trumps are not building a traditional dynasty through public service and gradual advancement. They’re using Trump’s presidency to establish parallel power structures — media platforms, party positions, and now potentially this Senate seat — that can outlast his term. This represents something smarter than simple nepotism, with Trump aggressively winning settlements and concessions from tech companies and networks that have covered him poorly.

Whether North Carolina voters will embrace this transformation remains uncertain. Cooper would enter the race as favourite, bringing genuine crossover appeal to a state where local elections remain competitive even if the presidential vote has gone to Republicans since 2008. Then again, betting against the Trump machine’s ability to reshape political reality has proven foolish before. The family that once mocked Lara now depends on her to secure its future, and she appears to have the necessary skill to finish the story.

---

Oliver Bateman is a historian and journalist based in Pittsburgh. He blogs, vlogs, and podcasts at his Substack, Oliver Bateman Does the Work

MoustacheClubUS

---

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.

---

Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam

---