X Close

Did White Lotus challenge the trans narrative on autogynephilia?

Is Sam an autogynephile? Credit: HBO

Is Sam an autogynephile? Credit: HBO

March 17 2025 - 10:50pm

On Sunday night, viewers of the latest White Lotus episode were treated to a soulful guest performance from Sam Rockwell as Frank, an old pal of series regular Rick (played by Walter Goggins). Frank meets Rick at a Bangkok hotel bar with a duffel bag of weapons, and orders chamomile tea as Rick sips Dewar’s.

Why the sobriety, Rick wants to know. And so, Frank tells him.

“I got it in my head that what I really wanted was to be one of these Asian girls, getting fucked by me, and to feel that,” he explains. Frank donned lingerie and perfume and advertised for his middle-aged white guy doppelganger, and hired an Asian girl to watch them have sex. “I’d look in her eyes while some guy was fucking me and think, I am her, and I’m fucking me.”

Frank waxes philosophical about sex and identity, asking the befuddled Rick: “Am I a middle aged white guy on the inside too, or inside, could I be an Asian girl?”

In that brief but compelling monologue, Frank has introduced viewers to one of the most controversial ideas in the cultural battle over all things trans: autogynephilia.

The term was coined by Dr. Ray Blanchard, a Canadian psychologist and sexologist who worked in the 1980s with patients seeking sex changes. A subset of the men had always been feminine, and grew to be attracted to men — those he dubbed “homosexual transsexuals.” But the majority were masculine men with gender-typical childhoods. They wereerotically aroused by the thought or image of themselves as women,” which could mean wearing women’s clothes or masturbating to the idea of themselves lactating or menstruating, or wanting men to have sex with them — not because they were gay, but because they wanted to “feel like a woman.”

Blanchard coined the term “autogynephilia” — Greek for “love of oneself as a woman,” sometimes shortened to AGP. He estimated that the majority of transwomen were autogynephiles, or AGPs — though the truth is, we have no way to tell.

That’s because no one is allowed to talk about AGP. Transwomen insist it’s not real, even as they describe their own propensities that line up with it. As Caitlin Jenner put it: “Sometimes I wonder if dressing up like this is the equivalent of having sex with myself, male and female at the same time.” But that didn’t stop some trans activists transforming Blanchard’s name into an insult: this “Blanchardian” idea was “alleging that most trans and transsexual women are psychosexually disordered ‘paraphilic’ ‘men’.”

The truth is that Blanchard, and other sexologists who’ve studied and written about AGP, don’t judge it. It’s but a clinical description of a cohort seeking sex-change surgery. It might not have seemed heretical at the time to ask why they wanted it. But indeed, to name AGP — to ask why someone might want to transition, rather than accept a simple gender identity/body mismatch — is so heretical that some sexologists who recognize it have had their livelihoods and reputations threatened. Any of us who write seriously about it find our dossiers on a website — a kind of “Wanted” poster for thought criminals.

And that’s where censorship really gets dangerous. Young men struggling with these erotic urges will have heard that gender identity and sexuality are separate, but for many people, they’re deeply intertwined. Maybe some AGPs will find more peace in physical transition, but maybe not. Maybe, like Frank, they’ll find that indulging the fantasy of being a woman only increases the obsession, only intensifies the need — because it can never truly be fulfilled. “I was trying to fuck my way to the answer,” Frank confesses.

Frank gives up sex altogether — along with booze, hence the chamomile tea, and the commitment to Buddhism over the “never-ending carousel of lust and suffering.” But maybe, if he’d grown up in a world that admitted autogynephilia existed, he wouldn’t have had to stop being sexual. Maybe he would have found a way to navigate AGP, or manage it.

Will a one-off scene in an HBO series open up that space for others struggling with those desires? I doubt it. Mike White, the series creator, hasn’t shied away from poking fun at the gender-elite classes. In season two, a young woman laments about how hard it is to find a nice boy who’s not non-binary. But just because he’s willing to portray a man aroused by the thought of himself as a woman doesn’t mean the cultural screaming matches around gender identity will calm down enough to tell the truth about it.

We don’t even know if White understands Frank as autogynephilic. What’s more important is that the rest of us watching do.


Lisa Selin Davis is the author of Tomboy. She writes at Broadview on Substack.

LisaSelinDavis

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam