X Close

Ben Stokes saved English cricket

Stokes was the latest in England’s line of flawed, maverick heroes. Credit: Getty

Stokes was the latest in England’s line of flawed, maverick heroes. Credit: Getty

29 June 2026 - 10:45am

Of course he retired in the middle of an over. Of course he took a wicket with the next ball he bowled. And of course he ran off the field to open the batting and orchestrate what must surely be the last moments of Bazball, the aggressive and euphoric style of cricket he engendered and embodied. What else did you think Ben Stokes was going to do? How else was it ever going to end?

Yesterday, Stokes announced he would retire from international cricket at the end of the current test against New Zealand. He has been a cricketer red in hair and tooth and claw — a player of moments, like the best heroes are. Cricket is a game of statistics where numbers are used to confer greatness, but there is a concurrent tradition that sometimes, in rare cases, the numbers might convey nothing at all. Stokes’s career is one of those.

The talismanic all-rounder is a trope of English cricket. The search for the “new Botham” began while Lord Ian was still playing, and a line drawn through Beefy to Andrew Flintoff and onto Stokes would tell the story of the English game in the modern age. If Stokes is less famous than either of his predecessors, then it is because his career has played out entirely behind the paywall of subscription television. Flintoff’s heroic series of 2005 was the last to be broadcast terrestrially.

Stokes has all the fearlessness and the tendency to self-destruct that characterised Botham and Flintoff’s time centre-stage. That was certainly the tale of his early career, when he blew a T20 World Cup final in the last over after being hit for four consecutive sixes by Carlos Brathwaite of the West Indies. A year later he was involved in a fight outside a Bristol nightclub called — unforgettably — Mbargo, which led to a trial for affray and a missed Ashes tour.

The greatness that had glimmered during a maiden Test hundred in Perth and a double century in Cape Town finally arrived in 2019. He levelled a knife-edge World Cup final at Lord’s against New Zealand with an unbeaten knock of 84 and then, amid almost unbearable tension, batted once again in the Super Over — an additional six balls played by each team in the event of a draw. It was followed barely a month later by the impossible rescue act of the Ashes Test at Headingley, when he made a storybook 135 in a last-wicket partnership with the bespectacled spinner Jack Leach, who notched a famous one not out.

Here, at last, was our new Botham, except then came another crushing low: the death of his father Ged and the black dog of a depression he was unafraid to show to the world. Stokes took a mental health break to recover and made a moving documentary about his plight, one that revealed the withering psychological price of top-level cricket.

Botham and Flintoff crashed and burned as England captains, so there was a wariness in handing Stokes the captain’s armband in 2022, and yet the team was transformed almost overnight. In partnership with Brendon “Baz” McCullum, a former New Zealand captain turned coach, Stokes formulated a credo that soon became a cult, with the players inducted into the team both set free by the philosophy and protected from its consequences.

At first it was revelatory, a series of apparently impossible run chases played out on golden afternoons in a style of cricket coined “Bazball”. The term caught on but became, as Stokes and McCullum predicted, a yoke around their necks when it all went wrong.

Predictably, given the history of England teams in Australia, Down Under is where it all came undone. The Ashes series of last winter began as one of the most anticipated in history but went sharply downhill from there to a harrowing 4-1 defeat, a loss that drove a wedge between captain and coach.

In the current series with New Zealand, Stokes has experienced what so many older players do — the feeling that the well has suddenly run dry. A ludicrous and self-sabotaging “controversy” over a broken non-curfew further derailed him.

Heroes, we know, must be flawed, but Stokes’s flaws have been minimal compared to his deeds. If cricket has kept its head above water in the last two decades, it’s as much down to Stokes as any single player. His efforts certainly supersede those of the broader cricket administration prone to po-faced ineffectiveness in a contracting marketplace besieged from all sides by football and a new generation that barely watches live television at all.

So stand down, soldier. You have been loved by those who got to see you. The game is lesser for your leaving.


Jon Hotten is an author and journalist. His books include Muscle: A Writer’s Trip Through a Sport with No Boundaries, The Years of the Locust and the novel, My Life And The Beautiful Music. His most recent book, The Meaning of Cricket, was published in 2016.

theoldbatsman

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

1 July 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam