X Close

Belfast knife attack reflects years of silence on immigration

Police attend the scene of last night’s stabbing in North Belfast. Credit: Getty

Police attend the scene of last night’s stabbing in North Belfast. Credit: Getty

9 June 2026 - 4:30pm

Late on Monday evening, a man in the Kinnaird Avenue area of North Belfast was the target of a brutal attempted murder. A circulating video of the event shows the attacker sitting atop his blood-soaked victim, apparently trying to behead the man. Several individuals attempted to wrestle the assailant off the victim, one using a hurling stick.

The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) revealed that the attacker is believed to be from Sudan, a correction from a previous statement claiming that he was Somali. Gavin Robinson MP, the Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party, stated in the House of Commons chamber that the suspect was living in Britain under a five-year visa, adding that the situation was still developing. Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson confirmed that the individual was given leave to remain in Northern Ireland, having made his way there via Dublin.

By failing to swiftly release clear information after the attack, the PSNI is inadvertently fuelling further tension. At the time of writing, we do not know the attacker’s name, his motive, or why he was allowed to remain in Britain in the first place. For many, now, it does not matter.

Anti-immigration tensions have been high in Northern Ireland ever since the riots in Ballymena, which began exactly one year ago today and followed a series of sexual assaults on young girls, allegedly perpetrated by members of the Romanian Roma community. More recently, the appalling murder of Henry Nowak focused attention on the failures and biases of police officers. Last month, footage emerged of a large group of men in a public park near Belfast, dancing around a fire with ceremonial knives similar in style to those at the centre of discussion in the Nowak case. DUP MP Sammy Wilson raised the issue in the House of Commons, revealing: “No arrests were made, excuses were made for carrying the weapons, and the anger of the community is palpable.”

Such anger is understandable. Following numerous attacks on British people in recent years by people with no justifiable reason to be in the country, very little has been done by the Government to ensure that these tragedies aren’t repeated. For many, politicians preaching for calm and offering thoughts and prayers is seen simply as inaction.

Protests have been planned for this evening across Northern Ireland, with protesters unlikely to heed calls for peace from the authorities. The community groups and activists organising the rallies, far from warning attendees to be careful, have said that “anyone seen recording anything tonight, their phone will be taken off them.” There is a real risk of repeating the events of last summer, where buildings were burnt and police came under sustained attack over several days.

Anti-immigration rhetoric has become mainstream in recent years, and has in turn shifted the Overton window in Northern Ireland. The political consequences of continued inaction would extend beyond the immediate inevitable disorder on the streets. If legitimate public concerns are not translated at pace into meaningful policy change, rather than just empty sentiments, the political space left empty by mainstream parties will not remain empty for long.

Radical groups on both the nationalist and unionist ends of the spectrum are well placed to capitalise on Government failure, particularly Left-wing parties such as Sinn Féin which have held longstanding pro-immigration stances. In the wake of last night’s attack, the Irish Republican Socialist Party defended those who have been accused of being racist for sharing concerns around immigration, saying: “It is not unreasonable to suggest (as the IRSP do) that migration into Ireland generally and into working class communities in particular, must not occur in a fashion which is detrimental to the interests of the Irish working class itself.”

The Northern Irish public were warned that an incident like what occurred last night would happen unless concerns over immigration were acknowledged. No one listened. Citizens have had enough thoughts and prayers to last a lifetime. What they want, and need, is action.


Adam James Pollock is a writer and photographer, and the author of Sustenance.


China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

1 July 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam