X Close

Sally Rooney: Israel is to blame for European fascism

‘We are watching the world’s richest and most powerful nations facilitate an undisguised genocide,’ Rooney said on Tuesday. Credit: Getty

‘We are watching the world’s richest and most powerful nations facilitate an undisguised genocide,’ Rooney said on Tuesday. Credit: Getty

June 18 2026 - 2:59pm

The Irish novelist Sally Rooney has claimed that the Israeli government is responsible for the rise of fascism in modern Europe.

Speaking at a Palestine solidarity event in Dublin on Tuesday evening, the Normal People author argued that “Israeli settler-colonial techniques have been inherited and refined from the practices of British and European colonialism.” She added that “the political classes in Europe today are cooperating with and learning from the US and Israeli regimes,” and that “far-Right, fascist movements [are] rising to power as a result.”

Pointing to “the perhaps irreversible damage the Israeli state has by now inflicted on the foundations of international law and the multilateral world system”, Rooney told the Dublin audience that European leaders have consequently “torn international law to shreds” and “made a mockery of their own voters” in supporting Israel’s war in Gaza. Labeling the Israeli campaign “the darkest [moment] that we have experienced in our lifetimes”, she claimed: “We are watching the world’s richest and most powerful nations facilitate an undisguised genocide.”

Rooney, who has written four novels, has consistently referred to Israeli action in Gaza as a “genocide”, including during a lecture given at London’s Southbank Center in 2024. At this week’s event in Dublin, she said that “the last three years have revealed more clearly than ever the extent to which the Israeli state functions as a projection of US power.” She added: “Foreign aid, weaponry, and military intelligence have flowed from wealthy Western nations into Israel, facilitating and supporting the mass killings of Palestinians.”

The author has previously declared her support for Palestine Action, whose proscription as a terrorist group was upheld by the Court of Appeal earlier this week. On Tuesday evening, she attacked “the radical and unprecedented criminalization of protest in nations like the UK […] including the designation of protesters as terrorists”, adding that “mainstream political parties are increasingly adopting authoritarian and fascist techniques to suppress protest and protect colonial interests.”

“Many of our old familiar methods of protest and dissent have by now proven completely inadequate to the challenge before us,” Rooney said at the Dublin event. “Many millions of us have tried taking to the streets, signing petitions, writing articles, emailing our representatives, and it is past time to accept that those tactics on their own have not worked.” In her view, “it is not enough for us as members of the public simply to know the facts, to sit at home, reading the news and shaking our heads in dismay.”

Rooney appeared at the meeting alongside Palestinian journalist Abubaker Abed, who now lives in Britain and who has previously described the October 7 attacks as “a great day”. According to figures from the International Federation of Journalists, at least 235 Palestinian reporters and media workers have been killed since the beginning of the Gaza war in 2023. The Irish writer highlighted these deaths, saying: “If we are to do justice to the bravery of those journalists who risk their lives to tell us the truth, then we have to stand up and take action.”

Rooney’s first two novels were translated into Hebrew by Israeli publisher Modan. In 2021 she refused to allow Modan to translate her third novel Beautiful World, Where Are You, citing her support for the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement. Last month, November Books — an independent, pro-Palestinian publisher in Israel — announced that it would publish a Hebrew translation of Rooney’s fourth novel, Intermezzo. In response, prominent pro-Palestinian activists including the writer Mohammed el-Kurd criticized Rooney for “creating loopholes to bypass sanctions”.

On Tuesday, Rooney claimed that “the truth of the world we live in, the logic of our civilization today, is there in the rubble of Gaza and, as we know all too well, the state of Israel has not and could not have conducted this campaign of genocide alone.” She added: “The liberation of Palestine really does represent the liberation of the world.”


Rob Lownie is UnHerd’s Deputy Editor, Newsroom.

RobLownie

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam