X Close

Why men are outspending women on Botox

Women can tell. Credit: Getty

Women can tell. Credit: Getty

June 9 2025 - 1:00pm

The face of masculinity is changing. No, literally: his jaw is buoyed by meaty masseters, his peepers pulled into a positive canthal tilt — “hunter eyes” do better on the dating market than “prey eyes” — and his bosom is honed into shiny brioche buns by hours down the gym. This is the New Man, and he spends more on Botox, fillers and dental veneers than his girlfriend does.

The revelation that 23% of men aged 18 to 34 have invested in such treatments — versus 21% of women — is the result of a new Barclays survey of spending patterns; experts put it down to high-definition cameras, gym culture and “constant online visibility”. I would bet that the aesthetics of the Gigachad — that muscle-bound icon of incel looksmaxxing boards — have also had an influence, filtering into mainstream male beauty standards. The logic: speedrun sexual prowess by getting some Polyfilla in your mandible.

The problem is that women can tell. As “filler blindness” enters the lexicon — typified by that one horrifying picture of Love Island girly Molly-Mae Hague — female celebrities have started rowing back on puffball pouts, dissolving their lips and deflating their cheeks. The dreaded “pillow face” has already ravaged the female populations of some British cities: this condition sees said filler migrate across your subcutaneous planes and makes you look like you’re 30 years older and in the throes of an allergic reaction. Go to Selfridges in Birmingham or Leeds: the escalators are strictly single-file to accommodate shoppers’ panoramic cheekbones.

But the march of the medspa-sexual male seems unstoppable. At the time of Molly-Mae’s stint on Love Island in 2019, the Turkey-teethed men on that dating show were freakish exceptions. Now radioactive veneers, which cost up to £1,800 per tooth, can be seen glowing in the dark of nightclubs from Essex to Ellesmere Port. The stigma of “tweakments”, and their containment within the gay world, has given way to mass appeal and affordable payment plans. After all, what’s a little Brotox between friends?

All this is surprising, not least because of men’s supposed invulnerability to beauty standards, which this trend reveals to be a big, fat lie. But it’s also odd because they have the privilege of being said to “age like fine wine”. Those considering a nip or tuck might want to consider the preferences of the opposite sex and realize that women have a much higher tolerance for grizzled gruffness, and far less truck with vanity and insecurity, than men do in women. Where celebrity dames have often been praised for their alien ability to defy time itself (Kris Jenner’s new face has recently set social media aflame) famous men who undergo plastic surgery more often than not end up looking freakish, cat-like and taut (think of Kris’s paramour Bruce, now Caitlyn).

Of course, naturally handsome men are hard to come by and they have been assisted through the ages by powdered wigs, beauty marks and tactical beards to hide weak chins. But the options available to modern men are expensive, invasive and freakily uncanny. The problem with tweakments is that they destabilize the very idea of masculinity these men are chasing: rugged, unbothered lumberjacks do not owe their pectorals to silicone implants.

Instead, such men are engaging in a kind of unwitting drag, a joke-shop version of manliness which tends more towards the male gaze than the female. Put down that numbing cream, hombre: it’s long been an open secret of bodybuilding competitions that being swole is to impress other men. Who’d have thought that one consequence of the feminization of culture would be men absorbing women’s somatic self-hatred?


Poppy Sowerby is an UnHerd columnist.

poppy_sowerby

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam