X Close

The Pope is not a heretic — but he is incompetent

Heretic? Credit: Getty

September 15, 2024 - 7:30pm

The current Pope is rarely out of the news. The latest crop of headlines feature his call for American voters to choose the lesser of two evils — i.e. Donald or Kamala. However, that wasn’t the only Francis controversy of the weekend.

The first kicked-off on Friday when, during an interfaith meeting in Singapore, he said that “every religion is a way to arrive at God”. (Or rather, that was the live translation from the original Italian.)

But in whatever language, his words have caused widespread consternation. Conservative Catholics, like Gavin Ashenden, are dismayed and so are other Christians. Rod Dreher (who is Orthodox) condemns the Pope’s universalism as a “rank Christian heresy”. Father Calvin Robinson (whose affiliations are complicated) calls the statement “counter-scriptural”. The satirical Babylon Bee (broadly Evangelical) imagines Francis challenging Jesus Christ “to a debate on how people can get to heaven”.

So where does this leave rank-and-file Catholics, like me? Do we have to accept that the head of our church — the one holy Catholic and apostolic Church — is a heretic?

No. Or rather, not quite. For a start, it’s obvious that Francis can’t have literally meant what he so carelessly said. Clearly, he doesn’t believe that all religions are paths to God. For instance, not even the flakiest theologian could think that sacrificing 20,000 captives to a sun god is an edifying spiritual exercise.

But assuming that Francis was only referring to the mainstream non-Christian religions, isn’t that bad enough? Are the words of Jesus in the Gospel of Saint John — “I am the way, and the truth, and the life… no man cometh to the Father, but by me” — not clear enough for him? Wouldn’t it be a problem if the Pope were to imply that Jesus can be bypassed?

Yes, it would. According to various Catholic publications (for instance, here and here), the official translation on the vatican.va website — “religions are seen as paths trying to reach God” — appears to finesse the Pope’s statement. This version can be viewed on the web page archived on 14 September. Obviously, this wording is less controversial than the original live translation.

However, as of today, the wording has been changed again! It now reads “all religions are paths to God”, which is almost back to the original translation. What a mess.

One can still reconcile the Pope’s words with the Gospels because, for Christians, Christ doesn’t exist as a tickbox on a good theology checklist, but as the second person of the Trinity. As God, He is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent — and thus within reach of any human heart that desires Him.

There is no reason to suppose that Francis doesn’t believe this too, but even in the midst of an interfaith dialogue he needs to communicate it. To do so with both clarity and sensitivity isn’t easy, but such abilities are part of the job description.

When the previous Pope, Benedict XVI, felt he couldn’t fulfil his duties anymore he abdicated. If the current Pope can’t lead his flock without sowing confusion then he too should consider his position.


Peter Franklin is Associate Editor of UnHerd. He was previously a policy advisor and speechwriter on environmental and social issues.

peterfranklin_

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

55 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments