X Close

The BBC has let Paris Lees rewrite womanhood

BBC Three's What It Feels Like For a Girl. Credit: BBC/Hera

BBC Three's What It Feels Like For a Girl. Credit: BBC/Hera

June 3 2025 - 6:30pm

Paris Lees rose to fame writing articles for people whose porn habits were getting in the way of their progressive credentials. In a succession of Vice articles in the mid-2010s, Lees reassured readers that (among other things) being objectified was fun; old-style feminists were bigots; and prostituted women were fine, actually. All this was “feminist” because Lees claimed to be a woman — not only that, but a trans woman, the most oppressed and hence the most authoritative woman of all.

For the progressive misogynist, “Paris Lees says so” was a significant upgrade on “the wife doesn’t mind”. Demands for further insights were to be expected. Lees’s 2021 memoir What It Feels Like For a Girl has now been made into a BBC Three series. If the title of the book and drama is “divisive”, then of course it’s meant to be. It’s intended to troll all those nasty women who will say that Lees has never been a girl. Then again, it’s a title that wouldn’t work without some tacit acceptance that the nasty women are right.

This is the curious thing about the BBC series: there’s not really any deception to it. This is a story about a boy and, as such, it has lots to say about masculinity, homophobia and male sexuality. There is very little on female experience, with women and girls generally existing as support humans, happy hookers or refrigerator mothers — not unlike 2021’s It’s a Sin.

At the start we see Lees’s character, Byron, trying to survive as a gay teenager, mocked by his father for “walking like a fairy” and taking beatings from local lads. After one such beating, he tells a concerned passer-by: “they’re calling me gay.” She responds: “So what if you are?” While not of any practical use, it’s an important moral message: so what if he is? Alas, by the end of the series (but only at the end) Byron will be claiming to be a woman. So, not gay after all.

The distinction feels blurry, though. This isn’t the trans activism to which we’ve become used in recent years, whereby sex distinctions are completely denied. Everyone knows, really, that Byron is still male. In the final episode when — now with long hair, make-up and typically female clothing — he briefly hooks up with an ex-lover, there’s no sense that they are suddenly no longer two gay men.

To this extent, you see glimpses of what trans inclusion could be. This is something that could, ironically, be summed up by that fateful JK Rowling tweet: “Dress however you please. Call yourself whatever you like. Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you. Live your best life in peace and security.”

If you know nothing about modern-day trans activism, What It Feels Like For A Girl creates the impression that it isn’t about enforcing a lie, but about making the best of the options you have. Byron and his friends’ understanding of “girl” may not be particularly feminist, but the Byron who reintroduces himself as Paris in the final scene does not seem to be claiming to be biologically female.

This is more reasonable than the trans maximalism we’ve come to expect of late, but not enough to let the series off the hook in terms of its politics. The other side to Paris Lees — the side that tempered the ranting about “the TERFS and the Meanies” — has always been a seductive mix of vulnerability and dark humor. This comes through strongly here, making the series both very watchable but also dangerously trivializing in relation to certain topics. Child sexual exploitation is treated light-heartedly, with the schoolboy Byron seeming to find being preyed on by adult males (mostly) absurd and amusing. “I’ve got something they want,” he tells his female-support-character classmate, “and it gives me power.” It’s a way in which many abused children recast their experiences as chosen (to then have this cast as “how girls feel” seems especially insensitive in light of recent grooming scandals).

It’s impossible to watch What It Feels Like For A Girl without wanting Byron to win out over the bullies. The “victory” of the real-life Lees has, however, taken the form of kicking out at women who would have been on his side, and leaving other young people — equally sidelined, but who cannot market themselves so well — to fend for themselves.

In terms of the series, Byron does “win”. He leaves home and finds friends out in the big, bad world. The story, though, feels undermined by the idea that it’s about a woman. It’s not, and it would have been much stronger and truer without the trans derailment. At a time when many are crying out for stories about the challenges of boyhood, this could have been a contender.


Victoria Smith is a writer and creator of the Glosswitch newsletter.

glosswitch

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam