X Close

Louise Casey: grooming gangs are still active in UK

Baroness Casey addresses the Home Affairs Committee this morning. Credit: Parliamentlive.tv

Baroness Casey addresses the Home Affairs Committee this morning. Credit: Parliamentlive.tv

June 17 2025 - 1:00pm

Baroness Casey, whose national audit of child sexual exploitation was published yesterday afternoon, has today claimed that “it is clear” grooming gangs are still operating in Britain. Addressing the Home Affairs Committee in Parliament this morning, Casey, who serves as the Government’s lead non-executive director, said that “people don’t necessarily look hard enough to find these children in particular”, and that collecting incomplete data on the ethnicity of perpetrators has been “a bloody disaster”.

Casey’s report has prompted widespread criticism of the response of Keir Starmer’s government to the scandal, given that Labour ministers have this year dismissed the need for a national inquiry into the grooming gangs and called references to perpetrators’ race a “dogwhistle”. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper yesterday apologized in the House of Commons for the British state’s failure to protect young girls who were systematically raped by organised gangs of mainly Pakistani men, acknowledging that Casey’s audit had exposed “a timeline of failure from 2009-25”.

In 2015, Casey authored a report into the response of children’s services and local authorities to child sexual exploitation in Rotherham. Seven years later, the social work adviser Alexis Jay published the findings of a nationwide investigation into safeguarding failures around the rape gangs, which Starmer cited in January as a reason not to conduct a new national inquiry. Casey told the Home Affairs Committee this morning that she previously shared the Prime Minister’s doubt but has now changed her view, highlighting the need for “accountability”.

Before her appearance in Parliament, Casey last night criticized Conservative Party politicians for their “politicisation” of the scandal. Speaking on the BBC’s Newsnight, she said she was “disappointed” that the Opposition had sought to make political capital from Labour’s failures, adding: “wouldn’t it be great if everybody came behind [the new national inquiry] and just backed it and got on with it?”

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch today held her own press conference alongside abuse survivors and their family members, in which she reiterated that grooming gang crime is “still ongoing” and that “a national inquiry is critical” for justice. She also stated that “the scale of this is much bigger than any of us envisaged even as we were looking at it,” and that she has herself personally apologized to victims. Badenoch denied Casey’s charge that she had politicized the issue, insisting: “Who was it who said this was dog-whistle politics? It was Keir Starmer and his ministers […] as Leader of the Opposition it is my job to hold the Government to account.”

The 2022 Jay report stated that “it is simply not possible to know the scale of child sexual exploitation by networks” in Britain. Tens of thousands of young girls are thought to have been abused across towns such as Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford, with some estimates exceeding 100,000 over several decades. Between 2005 and 2017, only 264 men were convicted for these crimes. “This is one of the biggest scandals that Britain has ever seen,” Badenoch said this morning. In her audit, Casey called it “one of the most horrendous crimes in our society”.


Rob Lownie is UnHerd’s Deputy Editor, Newsroom.

RobLownie

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam