X Close

Liz Cheney’s endorsement won’t help Kamala Harris

Zero followers. Credit: Getty

September 6, 2024 - 10:00am

“As a conservative, as someone who believes in and cares about the Constitution, I have thought deeply about this. And because of the danger that Donald Trump poses, not only am I not voting for Donald Trump, but I will be voting for Kamala Harris.” So said Liz Cheney during a Wednesday event at Duke University.

There is nothing Cheney’s recent endorsement can do for Harris. It will not help her presidential bid. And frankly, it won’t hurt her too much either. That’s because Cheney is irrelevant.

It is, of course, always amusing to revisit Cheney’s prior statements. As a Republican congresswoman in 2020, she posted on what was then Twitter: “Kamala Harris is a radical liberal who would raise taxes, take away guns & health insurance, and explode the size and power of the federal gov’t. She wants to recreate America in the image of what’s happening on the streets of Portland & Seattle. We won’t give her the chance.” She also described Harris as a “radical liberal” on Fox News at the time, claiming the Democrat’s voting record was “to the Left of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren” in the Senate.

This does not necessarily render Cheney’s sentiment insincere. She’s merely a member of the anti-Trump “Flight 93” movement, a group of people who see the threat of Trumpism as so great that it requires voting for his opponent, even if that person poses great threats as well. Boiled all the way down, this is just an age-old argument for the lesser of two evils.

There are people who share Cheney’s position, but they’re not undecided at this point and they’re hardly legion. As the proud daughter of a deeply unpopular former vice president, one associated with America’s deeply unpopular political establishment, it’s tempting to wonder whether an endorsement from Cheney could hurt Harris.

In reality, though, nobody is paying attention to Cheney outside the Beltway. She may have credibility with some MSNBC viewers and the #Resistance movement on X. But they’re already voting for Harris.

Vox recently asked David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report to explain what we know about undecided voters in swing states. This fractional but significant group, according to Wasserman, consists of people who “are more distrustful of institutions and government, tend to work blue-collar jobs, have less than a four-year college degree, have broad dissatisfaction with the two-party system, and believe that the Biden administration has mishandled the economy”.

In other words, this isn’t the key demographic for neoconservative nepo-babies whose primary political motivator appears to be the tragedy of 6 January. They’re people with bills to pay.

The flip side of this coin is that nobody who has yet to make up their mind cares enough about Cheney’s argument to vote against Harris because of it either. Like many politicians who flipped on Trump at one point or another, Cheney’s full 180 defies belief, which makes her sanctimoniousness all the more egregious to those of us who’ve had the misfortune of following her career. Fortunately for Harris, though, there aren’t many of us.


Emily Jashinsky is UnHerd‘s Washington D.C. Correspondent.

emilyjashinsky

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

56 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments