June 26, 2024 - 10:30am

In New York’s most watched House primary election — the most expensive in US history — Democratic Representative Jamaal Bowman became the first member of the ultra-progressive Squad to lose re-election. With 71% of ballots counted, his opponent, Westchester County Executive George Latimer, won the Democratic Party’s nomination with 56% of the vote in New York’s 16th Congressional District, which encompasses low- and high- income neighbourhoods in the Bronx and Westchester County.

A former school principal who ousted 16-term veteran Eliot Engel in the 2020 primary, Bowman had some advantages heading into this election season, including incumbency and national name recognition. New York is a “closed primary” state, meaning that only registered Democrats were eligible to vote in yesterday’s contest. This electoral format tends to reduce political competition and reward those with a motivated base. In the heavily Democratic district, the victorious Latimer will enjoy a near-invincible advantage in November’s general election.

Bowman’s strident anti-Israel stance, including repeated accusations of genocide, spurred the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac) to spend at least $14.5 million to unseat him. But Aipac’s ads didn’t directly criticise Bowman for his positions on Israel and Gaza. Instead, they characterised him as a radical opponent of President Joe Biden’s agenda on issues such as infrastructure spending and the debt ceiling.

This should worry progressives, as it reveals their policy vulnerabilities. A Siena poll last month found that pragmatic local concerns preoccupied statewide registered voters’ minds, such as lowering the cost of living, addressing New York’s migrant crisis, and improving public safety. This didn’t align with Bowman’s domestic priorities, which included higher taxes on the wealthy, single-payer “Medicare for All”, and an ambitious Green New Deal to counter climate change.

Margins matter in politics: Bowman couldn’t afford to alienate pro-Israel voters. The time and emphasis he devoted to international conflicts failed to mobilise his base, proving more of a liability than a rallying point. Meanwhile, Jewish early-voting turnout was reported at over four times the rate of non-Jewish voters. Undeterred, Bowman launched into an expletive-laden speech against Aipac at a South Bronx campaign rally on Saturday, which wasn’t even in his district. With Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also on stage, Bowman told the crowd: “My opponent and Aipac are the ones destroying our democracy.”

Bowman’s antics — especially his infamous pulling of a fire alarm in the Capitol last September that earned him a misdemeanour charge — might have made him uniquely vulnerable. Juxtaposed against the even-keeled Latimer, who has served in various Westchester public offices for over three decades, Bowman lived up to his opponents’ portrait of him as an unstable radical. This made it easy for Aipac and members of the party establishment to back Latimer, with former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and former New York governor Andrew Cuomo among the challenger’s supporters.

Bowman’s idiosyncrasies suggest it’s still premature to herald the demise of the Squad. But his defeat shows that 2020’s progressive campaign playbook isn’t working in 2024. It was Bowman’s race to lose, and he did.


John Ketcham is the Director of Cities at the Manhattan Institute.

JKetcham91