August 13, 2024 - 4:00pm
The Ukrainian raid on the Kursk region of Russia has taken both the Russians and Ukraineâs allies by surprise. There is no doubt that the raid has embarrassed Moscow. The Russian Ministry of Defence clearly left a weak point open in their lines that the Ukrainians were able to exploit. Yet at the same time, the Ukrainians have not really given any indication of what the strategic or even tactical goal of the raid is.
There are three related aspects that stand out about the raid and make it look unusual. First, if the raid is aimed at taking and holding Russian territory it is not clear what logistical routes the Ukrainians intend on using for resupply. Secondly, the Ukrainian army is already stretched thin along the main frontlines, so it is odd that the Ukrainians would remove some of their best soldiers to undertake a raid on Kursk unless there was some goal. Third, the fighting conditions in Kursk are dismal for the Ukrainians â their lack of air defence means that they are sitting ducks for Russian aircraft, missiles and drones.
Some have said that the raid is purely to generate attention for the Ukrainians, and this may well be true. But an alternative interpretation is that the Ukrainians are trying to capture the nuclear power plant in Kurchatov in the West of the Kursk region. News reports say that the Ukrainians have advanced 30 kilometres into Russia. But Russian war maps show that there is fighting as far into Russia as Kromskie Byki which is 60 kilometres from the Russian border by road. The Kursk nuclear power plant is around 50 kilometres from Kromskie Byki by road so from a purely geographical point-of-view the evidence suggests that Ukraine may be trying to capture it. Russia is anticipating an attack and forces are already building fortifications around the power plant.
The logic here would run something like this. At the start of the war the Russians captured the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant which was a huge loss to Ukraine. The largest nuclear power plant in Europe, the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant generated around 27% of Ukraineâs electricity before the war. If the Ukrainians could capture the Kursk nuclear power plant and hold it, they would then potentially be able to trade it for the Zaporizhzhia plant when the two sides begin negotiations. The fact that fires broke out at the Zaporizhzhia power plant this week also suggests that nuclear power plants may be in the crosshairs.
This is the only way to rationalise the Kursk raid. If the Ukrainian army was not targeting an asset that would give them advantage in negotiations it would signal that they were willing to lose some of their best units in a suicide run that was purely put on to get the cameras back on them. But if the raid is a desperate last-ditch attempt to get leverage over the Russians before entering negotiations, the raid makes sense. It would line up with recent polling that suggests almost half the Ukrainian population are now keen on peace talks and President Zelensky saying that he was considering holding a referendum on peace talks.
Yet a consistent theme of Ukrainian strategy throughout the war is that they undertake actions without considering their impact on the mindset of the other side. The Russian population is angry that the Ukrainians have succeeded in bringing the war to Russian territory and so the Putin government will now have to take a more aggressive line, potentially closing the window on peace talks for the foreseeable future. Add to this the fact that Ukrainian frontlines are already stretched and have now been deprived of some of their best units and it becomes clear that the coming months could be very hard for Ukraine.
If Ukraine succeeds in capturing the Kursk nuclear plant, they will have achieved a very real goal and will have captured a large pile of chips that they can use in future negotiations. If, however, they do not capture the power plant and Ukrainian units on Russian soil are gradually ground down, they will have lost a very large gamble. The Russian government will be angry and in search of revenge at the very same time as the stretched Ukrainian frontlines are deprived of some of their most battle-hardened soldiers.
Philip Pilkington is a macroeconomist and investment professional, and the author of The Reformation in Economics
philippilk
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeYet at the same time, the Ukrainians have not really given any indication of what the strategic or even tactical goal of the raid is.
.
You are absolutely right, this is a fatal mistake of the Ukrainians. They forgot to inform you of their intentions before the operation and, which is completely unforgivably, they are not going to do so now.
No need to mock the author for this comment. He is merely making the sensible point that he does not know what strategic or tactical goal the Ukrainians have, so all that follows is his own speculation. If the Ukrainians had said something, that might have given us a clue.
Like the author, I too have wondered what the Ukrainians think they are doing. We are all like spectators watching a chess match between two players. We can see what moves they make, but that does not always tell us what they are thinking.
To me the Ukrainians made a risky move into Russian territory that probably does as much harm as good. But we are still in the middlegame, not the endgame. This move may turn out to be foolish, to be brilliant, or not to matter much at all.
Time will tell. We can’t.
The difference between “foolish” and “brilliant” in relation to military operations can be wafer thin.
Itâs the last wafer that can make the difference.
Sorry, I have to upvote you đ
. deleted .
Fewer than 400 square miles, a tiny proportion of Kursk never mind of Russia, are presently occupied by Ukrainians who have no historic claim to them and who do not want them. Volodymyr Zelenksy just wants to make a brief point. The point being, one can only assume, that he had given up all hope of holding or retaking the Donbas, and was sending on this pointless stunt the troops who might have been sent to their doom in that lost cause. Zelensky’s constitutional term of office expired some time ago. If he has any legitimacy, then it is as military victor. Meaning that he has none at all.
I think he wanted to show that Ukrainians still have plenty of fight in them, so Western politicians have the pretext needed to quell domestic opposition to send Ukraine more weapons and money.
If Western voters had believed Ukraine never had a chance against Russia, would they have supported the supply of all this weaponry and money?
ie, unless the Ukrainians get very lucky, this will end in more death and suffering for the guys in the trenches while their “leaders” carry on the grift.
“To the last Ukrainian” indeed…
The attack is most likely an attempt in the short term to draw resources away from the Russia offensive in the Donbas. Russia has built up a significant artillery advantage in the south. This cannot be quickly or easily redeployed as artillery requires significant supply chains to operate. Shifting the fight to an area where the combat is more mobile both removes units from a key sector but also provides a more advantageous situation to fight from.
In the longer term this is the second time Russia has been caught out by a surprise Ukrainian offensive. The fact that Ukraine has demonstrated they can evade Russian surveillance will mean they are going to have to commit more resources to manning quieter sections of the line, in particular their own border, diverting further resources from key areas.
Whether or not this pays off, itâs too early to say but I donât believe reasoning behind the offensive is quite as inscrutable as the author claims.
Not having your best mobile units pounded by stacked artillery sounds like a good enough reason.
ârecent polling that suggests almost half the Ukrainian population are now keen on peace talks and President Zelensky saying that he was considering holding a referendum on peace talks.â
Many of us on this site have been accused of being âPutinâs puppetsâ for thinking this. Does this mean the same for almost half of the Ukrainian population? And Zelensky saying heâs considering holding a referendum on peace talks. Is that defeatism or just the inevitable?
You have to remember one of the greatest weapons of any war is propaganda. In this case, it would sound like this: Russians or their supporters “unintentionally leak” the information that the Ukraine president is thinking of holding a referendum and also the fact that half the Ukraine population is thinking about giving up, going into peace talks. The morale of those who fight is lowered, as they start thinking whether its worth giving their lives for a lost war. If information has not been spread by Russians and their trolls, those who reproduce this information are either very gullible or stupid.
Of course propaganda works that way, but this poll is from a Ukrainian newspaper. (It also claimed that a large proportion were resistant to neutrality). So I guess youâre thinking the newspaper is spreading propaganda. Which is odd in a country with control over the media. Can we just give the Russian boogeyman a rest. I noted in regard to the disruption of trains at the Paris Olympics initial stories said it was Russian, Really, just who are the gullible and stupid?
Why does a “macroeconomist and investment professional” think he has the knowledge to write something useful on military strategy?
What has not been mentioned is the Russian supply lines and logistics. Kursk is a key point for Russian trains moving armaments and tanks etc. If Ukraine can disrupt the trains and maintain that it gives Russian forces a large logistical problem.
Zelensky is highlighting for his purported allies why russia must be forced to defend its homeland whilst it attacks Ukraine…..otherwise russia are free to deploy all their resources in the Donbas. why on earth should the aggressor have this luxury. High time the West’s definition of defence included the use of our weapons to attack the border states in russia to degrade Russia’s offensive capability in Ukraine
Obviously, the Ukrainians had some reason for launching the attack. The best explanation I can come up with is that they are desperately looking for a way to make continuing the war not worth while for Putin while also hoping to capture territory that they can trade for their own when peace talks get underway. Perhaps the invasion suggests that peace talks are not far off.