X Close

ICE backlash is pushing LA towards New York-style chaos

'All this is a tragedy for the city, but a boon for Left-wing politicians.' Credit: Getty

'All this is a tragedy for the city, but a boon for Left-wing politicians.' Credit: Getty

July 13 2025 - 4:00pm

Los Angeles politicians have long dreamt of their city overtaking New York as North America’s dominant economic center. Yet if LA is now becoming more like New York, it is for entirely the wrong reasons.

Radical anti-ICE protests that began last month have continued into July in California. This fury has only been exacerbated by the death on Friday of a man who was injured during an ICE raid on a cannabis farm. With nearly a million undocumented migrants living in LA, the city has become a natural setting for these demonstrations, while Mayor Karen Bass is seemingly opposed to any efforts to enforce immigration laws. The largely youthful demonstrators have habitually broken laws, attacked police, and set fire to Waymo vehicles. Radicals hail what they call “a student intifada”. One local political leader has even suggested the city’s notorious gangs join the fight against ICE officers.

How did it come to this? The decline of the higher-end economy has left LA’s roughly 50% Latino population in a dire state. The city was once a beacon of opportunity for migrants, but Latino incomes, adjusted for cost of living, and homeownership rates are among the lowest in the nation. LA’s poverty rates are the highest of anywhere in California and among the worst in the country, and it’s the immigrants who suffer most. One study from last year found that 41% of undocumented migrants under the age of 26 live in poverty. Undocumented households have a median income of $46,500, compared to $75,000 among all Angelenos.

What’s more, LA now suffers from a low-wage/high-welfare model, dependent on poorly-paid immigrants who rely on government support. The Congressional Budget Office warned last year that the “massive surge in immigration” in recent years will impact the salaries of low-income US workers, who compete with newcomers for living space, jobs and social services.

All this is a tragedy for the city, but a boon for Left-wing politicians. The Democratic Socialists of America, of which Zohran Mamdani is a member, already hold four seats on LA’s 15-seat city council. Backed by the all-powerful public employee unions, they have been able to apply pressure on the hapless Bass.

Many of the causes behind New York’s Leftward drift are also present in LA, such as a shortage of affordable rental housing. As in the Big Apple, this has galvanized not only the poor but also the struggling urbanistas who wish for the city to become denser. Meanwhile, in LA, every basic industry — from manufacturing to finance to business — has stagnated in the last half-decade, with significant growth confined to government-funded education and health jobs. Even the city’s signature entertainment industry is losing jobs as production moves to other states and countries.

Also similarly to New York, a restless underclass has grown out of Los Angeles’s failure to integrate many of its citizens. The city already suffers from sporadic crime waves, particularly downtown, including smash-and-grab riots, the vandalism of MTA buses, and theft of copper from street lights. The anti-ICE protests have only brought this into clearer focus.

The fiscal implications of this orgy of virtue signaling could be severe. Until the next election, sanctuary city policies will no longer be subsidized by federal transfers, forcing even the most dogged progressives to reconsider their generosity. LA, much like Gotham, already suffers from a deepening budget hole. Once the harbinger of a robust multi-cultural prosperity, Los Angeles is now taking cues from the East Coast on how to destroy a once-great city.


Joel Kotkin is a Presidential Fellow in Urban Futures at Chapman University and a Senior Research Fellow at the Civitas Institute, the University of Texas at Austin.

joelkotkin

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam