X Close

Have the Tories really learnt from their mistakes?

The Conservatives may be entering into long-term exile. Credit: Getty

September 10, 2024 - 7:20pm

So Mel Stride has been knocked out of the latest round in the Tory leadership election. Remember Mel Stride? No, me neither. But as one of the few ministers left willing to go out to bat for Rishi Sunak’s dying government during the daily media rounds, could he really have represented the future of the Conservative Party anyway?

Not that the remaining candidates fare much better by this metric, former senior ministers as they all are. Each seeks to disown the inheritance they played their own personal part in building.

But a leadership campaign is an opportunity for ideological freedom — for unhelpful shibboleths to be discarded, biases to be challenged and fixed viewpoints and policy positions to be reassessed in all frankness. It is easy to deliver sermons on the moral failures of Boris Johnson’s premiership, or to lament the political and operational failures of the Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak governments: these are self-evident. It’s easy, too, to promise the red meat of tax cuts and an anti-woke agenda to the party base.

Yet examining whether Truss might have been right in her diagnosis — if not her prescription — is a far more difficult proposition of introspection. Who among the candidates has a theory about how the party managed to oversee more than a decade of stagnant economic growth and wages, and has challenged the Conservative hierarchy to understand the economic and political underpinnings of this unsatisfactory order?

Tory defeat in 1997 may have been comparably catastrophic to 2024, but the party at least felt it had a record to defend. This year offers no such indulgence. Not even leadership frontrunner Robert Jenrick is keen to defend his party’s record in government.

Just look back to Ed Miliband in the 2010 parliament. By casting doubt on the worthiness of the last Labour government with his own faint praise, he offered up political territory to the Conservatives: they could simply march their troops onto the open, undefended land.

But for the Tory Party after this defeat, challenging itself and engaging in self-criticism is essential. Nobody should be prepared to defend its woeful outcomes on the economy, migration or public services.

At first, it will be too offensive to declare that the party can no longer rely on offering pork-barrel goodies to a dwindling set of grey voters. But challenging the status quo of a pensioners’ welfare and planning system that hands out cash to retirees, and prevents the building of infrastructure and new homes, is vital. Not facing up to these realities has led the party to catastrophic defeat in any case, yet it’s unlikely to give a mandate to change this order without the maturity that comes through serial defeat.

And without a mandate to tear up the incentive structures that have given us such woeful outcomes, whoever ends up winning the contest is unlikely to be offered permission by the party to truly change its nature. Without the power to change the party, and then offer a changed party to the country, what reason is there to believe the next election result will be much different?


James Sean Dickson is an analyst and journalist who Substacks at Himbonomics.

Gaylussite

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments