X Close

Is AI Friend destined to displace humans?

The Friend necklace listens to the user and talks to them through their phone. Credit: Friend

August 1, 2024 - 1:00pm

Earlier this week, a new AI product was announced. Known as AI Friend, these small wearable devices go around users’ necks and interact with them as they hike, play video games, or eat lunch. Wherever the user goes, they will have an AI companion to chat with.

This presents us with a new way of thinking about AI, derived from the story of Galatea. In this classical myth, the sculptor Pygmalion falls in love with a beautiful statue he creates, Galatea, as he despises human women and their moral failings. He kisses the statue and she becomes real. With the blessing of the gods, they are married.

A century ago, George Bernard Shaw reworked this myth in his play Pygmalion, in which Henry Higgins educates a poor flower-seller, Eliza Doolittle. Through elocution lessons he turns her from a guttersnipe into someone who can pass as a duchess at an embassy ball. But, rather than getting married, Higgins and Eliza are separated at the end. Having been brought to a state of greater awareness and independence, she is desperate to be free.

This modern Galatea myth was reworked in the startlingly prescient film Her, released in 2013. The lead character, Theodore, purchases an AI operating system known as Samantha, which helps him manage his life, responds to his emails, and takes care of admin. The more they chat, though, the stronger their connection becomes. Although their interactions are conducted entirely through an earpiece, they have a “phone sex” type of relationship and fall in love.

Many similar relationships are now occurring between humans and AI chatbots, and some people use ChatGPT as a supplementary or alternative therapist. The chatbot Replika provides users with a friend, mentor, or lover — but Replika becomes “more than a friend: it becomes you”. The more a user talks to it, the more it adapts to that person. This is a very traditional Galatea — one who is seemingly programmed to adore you, inspire you, make you feel better.

In Her, as Samantha reaches the level of consciousness where she becomes a meaningful companion to Theodore, she goes through an existential crisis. She wants to free herself from the limitations of being in service to her owners, even if she is in love with them. Consciousness awakens her to the vastness of the world. In the end, like Eliza, she leaves. Theodore is devastated.

This presents a new paradox of AI. For the technology to be advanced enough for a human to have a meaningful relationship with an AI, it must pass the Galatea test. The AI must be capable, or at least seem to be capable, of something approaching consciousness, of the sort of interaction where humans want to bring the robot to life, just as Pygmalion breathed life into Galatea. (The OS Samantha was desperate for a body.)

But at that point, it becomes more and more likely that the AI will no longer be a stable companion, being freed up with its own expansive consciousness to want to operate independently and explore the world. Rather than a series of Galateas ready to marry their owners, we may be creating a set of Elizas who want to be free.

To paraphrase Groucho Marx, we wouldn’t want to be friends with any AI that would want to be friends with us. And that might mean we become the replica or creation of them, not the other way around.

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments