X Close

Moody’s US credit rating downgrade has spooked investors

'Few in the political class give deficit concerns much more than lip service.' Credit: Getty

'Few in the political class give deficit concerns much more than lip service.' Credit: Getty

May 18 2025 - 5:00pm

On Friday, the rating agency Moody’s finally joined its two principal rivals, Fitch and S&P, in stripping the US government of its perfect AAA credit rating. In doing so, it cited rising debt and budget deficit, and changed its outlook for US public finances from stable to negative.

As a market-moving action, this probably won’t matter much. Yields on the benchmark 10-year bond rose a notch following the news, but this arguably reflected existing worries among investors as much as anything else. US bond yields have been rising for years now. And in warning that the deficit was on track to reach 9% of GDP by 2035, and that there was no apparent plan to alter this trajectory, Moody’s didn’t reveal anything that market-watchers didn’t already know. What’s more, while many institutional investors are required to maintain a part of their portfolio in the safest securities, the scale of the downgrade isn’t such that many positions will be forced to liquidate. As a result, there is unlikely to be a run on US bonds just yet.

Nevertheless, the development is symptomatic of a looming problem in America’s finances, one which could reach boiling point later this year. It’s not clear when global patience with US profligacy will run out, but there have been growing signs of dissatisfaction among investors in recent months. Meanwhile, the volatility of the Trump administration’s policymaking has led some international fund managers to reconsider their degree of exposure to US assets.

Aside from a handful of Congressional Republicans, few in the political class give deficit concerns much more than lip service. Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill”, which aims to extend the 2017 tax cuts and was blocked in the House of Representatives on Friday, would either blow up the deficit, cut benefits, or simply continue to linger indefinitely in the halls of the Capitol.

None of these three scenarios would make US debt a more attractive option. The first would add a further $5 trillion to the existing debt stock of $36 trillion, according to estimates by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. With US borrowing thus continuing to grow considerably faster than the economy, the country would risk either struggling with the burden of debt repayments — raising the spectre of a default — or inflating its way out of debt by allowing prices to rise faster than interest rates. Either way, investors would stand to lose money.

The second scenario, of sweeping cuts to public pensions and healthcare, could induce a political crisis and create a powerful anti-incumbent mood. It is therefore far from a sustainable option. The last scenario, of the budget-haggling continuing indefinitely, would add to the high degree of uncertainty already plaguing American politics. Given that major investments are often put on hold until long-term government plans become clear, this would slow the economy and curtail a stock market relief rally that already looks suspiciously fragile.

Whichever of these scenarios comes to pass, things will likely come to a head in the next few months. Given that this time will overlap with the end of Trump’s 90-day moratorium on tariffs, at which point he’ll have to decide whether to extend or scrap them altogether, anxiety levels among investors could well reach fever pitch.


John Rapley is an author and academic who divides his time between London, Johannesburg and Ottawa. His books include Why Empires Fall: Rome, America and the Future of the West (with Peter Heather, Penguin, 2023) and Twilight of the Money Gods: Economics as a Religion (Simon & Schuster, 2017).

jarapley

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam