X Close

Trans prisons ruling is an important step for women’s safety

Groups such as For Women Scotland have challenged the policy of placing trans-identifying prisoners with female inmates. Credit: Getty

Groups such as For Women Scotland have challenged the policy of placing trans-identifying prisoners with female inmates. Credit: Getty

June 21 2026 - 1:00pm

Few arguments for female-only spaces are as compelling as the need to protect women in prison. Female prisoners are among the most vulnerable people in society; many have survived sexual abuse, domestic violence, exploitation, and trauma long before entering custody. It is baffling that it has become controversial to suggest that locking these women up with male criminals puts them at risk.

We should therefore be encouraged by Friday’s judgment in Scotland, where Lady Ross ruled that prison guidance permitting male prisoners who identify as women to be accommodated in the female estate is unlawful. The normative effect of this latest victory in the courts is significant. If we can see the inhumanity of putting men in such close quarters with vulnerable women, perhaps it will become clearer why it is similarly unsuitable to allow them in hospital wards, changing rooms and rape crisis centers.

Supporters of the policy have argued that prisoners should be assessed individually rather than housed according to sex. The difficulty with this approach is that risk is often impossible to predict. Currently, the decision on whether a trans-identified man is admitted to a female jail is based on an assessment of whether he has ever posed a risk to women. And yet we know from the evidence that sexual offenses are massively overrepresented in this specific cohort of males. Figures from 2024 show that, of the 245 trans-identified males in prison, 151, or 62%, had been convicted of a sexual offense. This is a far higher rate than that for the overall male prison population (around 17%). There was nothing exceptional about 2024 — a similar rate (56%) was reported for 2023.

Sandra*, an addict who has been in and out of prison over the past few years for theft-related crimes, was locked up in HMP Bronzefield in Surrey with a trans-identified male. He was very large and broad-shouldered, she tells me, and sported a long wig. He would rub his crotch during mealtimes, while staring at the women. “I reported him,” Sandra says, “and two other women also told the officers that they felt uncomfortable. We were warned that we’d be on charges of being ‘transphobic’ if we didn’t pipe down, and we would have privileges removed.”

The women’s overwhelming fear was that they wouldn’t be protected by the officers if anything were to happen. And when it did — Sandra was sexually assaulted in the showers — she was disbelieved. She has since taken out a legal case against the prison service, and awaits a response.

Some judges are sympathetic to the dangers. Amy* was also sexually assaulted in prison and subsequently took out a legal case. In a 2021 judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde accepted that Amy had raised real concerns, and that “a substantial proportion of women prisoners have been the victims of sexual abuse and/or domestic violence.” He acknowledged that many women would “suffer fear and acute anxiety if required to share prison accommodation and facilities with transgender women with male genitalia and convictions for sexual and violent offenses against women”.

But Holroyde also said that focusing on previous sexual convictions was a “misuse of the statistics, which… are so low in number, and so lacking in detail, that they are an unsafe basis for general conclusions”. With this, the concerns raised by prisoners such as Amy are dismissed.

In response to the judgment, Susan Smith of For Women Scotland expressed her hope that this would be the last time women have to go to court to defend rights we thought we had already secured. I doubt it will be. But the victory is still groundbreaking. Most people will never set foot inside a prison; few will ever have a loved one behind bars. It means that female prisoners are easy to ignore. But even the most marginalized are entitled to basic dignity and safety. Lady Ross’s judgment will carry resonance far beyond the cells, reaffirming the principle that women everywhere have the right to be kept safe.

*Names have been changed.


Julie Bindel is an investigative journalist, author, and feminist campaigner. Her latest book is Lesbians: Where are we now? She also writes on Substack.

bindelj

China is threatening America in the AI race

Reports sugget Zhipu AI  has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

Reports sugget Zhipu AI has released a new model that can rival leading US systems. Credit: Getty

July 1 2026 - 10:18am

China is trying to catch up with America on artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Zhipu AI — one of China’s six “AI tiger” LLMs — has released a new model that can rival leading US systems, including Anthropic’s Mythos, in cybersecurity tasks such as pinpointing security bugs. While this marks a milestone in China’s drive to catch up with Western AI capabilities, strong performance on a single benchmark does not mean it has taken the lead. Chinese models still lag behind their Western counterparts in broader capabilities, such as autonomous operation. Skepticism is therefore warranted before resorting to hysterical conclusions, but complacency about the geopolitical implications of China’s AI advances would be an even greater mistake.

On the infrastructure side, Chinese AI is still constrained by access to advanced chips, with American labs way ahead in computing capacity as well as investment. Analysis from earlier this year suggests that Chinese models are likely to be at least a few months behind those in the US. But they are still continuing to make progress, or that the geopolitical importance of AI will be decided only by whose LLM has ventured deeper into the technological frontier. The practical applications of AI, countries’ to capture foreign markets, and the application of AI into the real economy will matter just as much.

Here, China may hold an advantage. As with its dominance across many critical supply chains, Beijing may not need to produce the most advanced AI systems — only those that are affordable and widely deployable. In doing so, it could consolidate global influence by supplying functional, low-cost AI at scale.

Beijing seems to be pursuing exactly that path, developing an AI “open-source” strategy that offers affordable, widely available AI models for companies and individuals to use and modify as they wish. The production of the DeepSeek AI model, which matched the performance of Silicon Valley tools such as ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost for users, created goodwill among Chinese models with developers.

The four most popular models on OpenRouter, an AI hardware platform for developers, are now all Chinese. The goal for China is not only to win the frontier-model race, but to make its systems the default layer of AI adoption across industries and global markets. For most economies, the choice is increasingly between an affordable tool they can deploy now and a more robust one that may be out of reach.

And while the countries adopting Chinese models may be exposed to political pressure and cyber threats from Beijing, safer and more capable alternatives matter little if they are unaffordable. American AI companies are already under pressure to monetize products whose operating costs are rising. If Chinese open-source models become the cheap default for startups, universities, governments and businesses across the developing world, then America’s AI lead will be eroded from below.

Perhaps more concerning for America in the long run is how AI can give Chinese manufacturing even more strength, through the ongoing integration of AI as a general-purpose technology. China’s new Five-Year Plan mentioned AI more than 50 times and includes an “AI+” action plan aimed at spreading AI across the economy.

Beijing has been pioneering automation of its critical infrastructure for years, with promising recent results in increasing warplane production capacity. In that regard, China’s open-model strategy and manufacturing dominance will reinforce each other. Cheap, adaptable models accelerate deployment across the real economy while those deployments generate real-world data and use cases that can feed back into further model improvement.

The United States should not dismiss the importance of its lead in the AI race. That lead worries Beijing, not least because a more automated Chinese economy would also become more vulnerable to AI-generated cyber threats. But nor should Washington assume that China cannot catch up with American capabilities over time.

This AI competition represents part of a broader struggle over tech supply chains and geopolitical influence. Decisions over whether to adopt US or Chinese models could produce a more fragmented global reality, with different regions relying on different cloud providers, chips and security structures. The result will likely be a global economy which is divided into competing spheres, rather than one which produces a single winner.


Miquel Vila is a political and geopolitical risk consultant focusing on industrial strategy, critical infrastructure and global supply chains.

miquelvilam