X Close

Rural France has lost its spirit The land of Albert Camus is in mourning

Their countryside has been stripped of life. In Pictures Ltd./Corbis/Getty Images

Their countryside has been stripped of life. In Pictures Ltd./Corbis/Getty Images


July 15, 2024   5 mins

At about two in the afternoon on 4 January 1960, a powerful Facel Vega two-door coupé appeared to waltz off a perfectly straight stretch of the Route Nationale 5 flanked on either side by parades of plane trees. The scene was Petit-Villeblevin, 100 kilometres southeast of Paris. Rebounding between trees, the opulent car was very badly smashed. Its driver, the publisher Michel Gallimard, died in hospital a few days later. His front-seat passenger, 46-year-old Nobel Prize winning novelist Albert Camus, was killed instantly. “I know nothing more stupid”, he had said not long before, “than to die in a car accident.”

Camus had accepted a lift from Lourmarin, the picturesque Provençal village where he had bought a house in 1958 and where his family had spent the New Year with Gallimard’s. His wife, Francine, and their twins returned to Paris by train from Avignon. Camus and the Gallimards took to the road with Floc, their Skye terrier. This was the era before autoroutes. The drive north through rural France was along the tree-lined Routes Nationales, with an overnight stop at the simple, Michelin-recommended Chapon Fin inn at Thoissey near Macon and lunch on the 4 January at the Hôtel de Paris et de la Poste, Sens, where the party ate boudin noir aux pommes de reinette and shared a bottle of Fleurie.

Gallimard was a highly experienced driver and, at Camus’s request, nursed the 200km/h Facel Vega at no great speed towards Paris. Quite what caused the fatal crash —  possibly a mechanical failure — no one quite knew or knows. Ever since, the beautiful twin rows of trees that have so characterised and even defined great stretches of rural France, planted in a programme to improve trunk roads throughout the country from the late 1730s, have been accused of murdering motorists, motorcyclists and Nobel prize winners alike. Found guilty, they have been chopped down on a Reign of Terror scale. Where there had once been three million of these roadside sentinels, today there are fewer than 250,000.

Few politicians could be more pleased with this result than Jean Glavany, agriculture minister from 1998-2002 in Lionel Jospin’s “Plural Left” government. In 2001, the death of a young motorcyclist in Glavany’s Haute-Pyrénées constituency prompted biker gangs to attack 168 trees with chain saws. In the aftermath of the accident, Glavany said that roadside trees were to blame for 799 deaths in the previous year alone. “We must not hesitate”, he barked, “to cut down the trees when it is necessary.” Conservationists replied that the answer was not to accuse the trees, but to address the causes of the crashes: speeding, drink driving, mobile phone use, poorly timed overtaking and sheer fatigue.

Over the past fortnight, I drove much the same route as Camus and the Gallimards from close by Lourmarin before diverting north of Paris to Calais. For one who has cycled and driven along these roads over many years, the loss of the trees along the old Routes Nationales is devastating. Their disappearance is matched by the increasing hollowness of villages and small towns along the way: berets have long been ousted by logo-emblazoned baseball caps, burgers and pizzas are on offer at every turn, Gitanes dangling from lower lips are a thing of a Camus-distant past. While Lourmarin, like so many Provençal villages, is a tourist “destination” today, villages off the tourist beat are increasingly shopless, shuttered and all but silent for most of their deep-sleeping days. The Chapon Fin inn at Thoissey and the old Hôtel de Paris et de la Poste at Sens have vanished, too.

“Berets have long been ousted by logo-emblazoned baseball caps, Gitanes dangling from lower lips are a thing of a Camus-distant past.”

It’s not just that many former residents have upped sticks for hopefully more rewarding lives in French cities, but that so few people stop by them on road trips whether for coffee or lunch or to pick up baguettes, olives, ham, cheese and cherries because there is nowhere to do so. Nowhere to buy a baguette? Mon Dieu. Reason enough for rural protest. This sorry pattern is replicated through great swathes of France. True, rural depopulation is nothing new in this big country, but the extent of it today is alarming.

You can choose to scythe through France on your way to the south, the sun and the sound of crickets along autoroutes largely oblivious to the small towns and villages on either side of 130km/h carriageways. If, though, there is a clue as to what might be happening around you, it comes in the guise of motorway toll gates. In recent years, these have been automated and are now staffless. Do those who once took your cash (comment?) now work in petrol stations on the edge of towns? Probably not. These are increasingly automated, too. So, you can drive from Calais to Provence without needing to meet or address anyone, or having to speak French, until perhaps you check in at your hotel.

Driving through the Massif Central, Auvergne, Burgundy and Champagne is an extraordinary experience. Such beautiful countryside; such a wonderful stock of handsome buildings. And yet, it seems all too often that neutron bombs must have fallen throughout rural France leaving its fabric more or less intact, but its population evaporated.

Despite numerous journeys through rural France, I have never knowingly met or conversed with a fascist, although I suppose very few people today in most of Western Europe would admit to being one. The impression the mainstream media gives — French and British alike — is of a rural France in thrall to “hard-Right” politics. What I have met is a sadness, a frustration and an anger nurtured by the powerlessness people of all ages feel as their countryside is stripped of life, their way of life. The very life promoted by tourist boards and the rose-tinted travel pages of newspapers and magazines. But when the political parties and the tree choppers of Paris appear to care little or nothing for their situation, how can the people of rural France not turn to political parties which say they are on their side? How can they not despise Emmanuel Macron whose security forces took out the eyes and blew off the hands of protesting gilet jaunes?

In this month’s French election, 37% voted for Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella’s “hard-Right” Rassemblement National (a larger proportion than that which voted for Keir Starmer’s triumphant Labour Party in the recent British election). It is easy to imagine support for RN growing in coming years. If Paris and the Left wanted to derail its opponents, and if it had sufficient common sense and humanity, it would aim to bring work and life back to rural France. It would see people as more important than automatic machinery and superficial technological efficiency.

Although Camus’s Lourmarin housed outsiders — artists, writers, summer holidaymakers — it was a working village in the old sense. The novelist’s best friend there was the blacksmith César Marius Reynaud, whose family had run the business for 400 years. Camus kept a donkey, rescued from Algeria. The only animals I saw in Lourmarin were well-groomed dogs, hopeful pigeons, basking cats and the occasional lizard.

Of course, things change. Imagine, though, government schemes that gave, for example, generous tax breaks to local start-up businesses and to companies happy to have staff working away from their main offices. Imagine cross-country railways with greatly improved services, which, outside the exclusive realm of the superb TGVs, are sparse in much of France. Imagine new types and forms of rural employment fusing hi-tech communications with craftsmanship and husbandry. Imagine, most of all, young people being offered the opportunity to live and work in beautiful parts of profound France. With good communications, this could yet be a dream for many.

For now, the mainstream parties’ and media’s lack of genuine concern for rural France is, at best, a political car crash in the making.


Jonathan Glancey is an architectural critic and writer. His books include Twentieth Century Architecture, Lost Buildings and Spitfire: the Biography


Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments